ARKIVOC

的 　已投结果未知 　2015-05-26 10:40:47.0

投稿经验：找他要个版权要了这么久，发邮件老是被退回来 其他用户回复：

guozhu6024 　2015-01-25 12:44:00.0

2014年11月18日投稿，11月24日，Coordinating Editor 给拒稿：格式不合ARKIVOC要求。并且Coordinating Editor 给出了很详细的格式修改意见，让修改后重投。修改后，重投。11月30日，Coordinating Editor 回复说改得不合格：Your revised manuscript has reappeared in double quick time, and I have to say that, had you spent a little longer over it, its condition would probably have been better. The "asymptotic approach to perfection" is not one we would recommend. But you have thinned out the author line, and reorganised the schemes so that the captions are now loose; it cannot be denied that the new version is an improvement on either of the previous ones. 领教了Coordinating Editor 的一丝不苟后，12月3日重新上传。Coordinating Editor 回复：Thank you once more for your revision. I should assure you that I do not criticise your paper to annoy you, but in order that it might (in my view) have a better chance of passing the referees, who are likely to be more severe critics than I am. 很好的编辑！！赞一个！！ 12月16日收到审稿意见：Based on referee reports, I think that your manuscript “\XXXXXXXXXXX\' in principle can be accepted for publication provided that you make the changes recommended by the referees. Please list the changes made in accordance with the referees\' suggestions and return the corrected manuscript within a maximum of six weeks. Failure to respond within this time span will result in the paper being withdrawn. 惊喜。 之后一直忙于做其他实验，断断续续地改。2015年1月13号上传修改稿。2015年1月15号收到邮件：Dear Dr. XXX, I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript "XXXXXXXXXXXX' has been conditionally accepted for publication in ARKIVOC provided that you make all changes to the paper required by the Publishing Editor. Please note that I have forwarded your manuscript to the Publishing Editor and do not have any further control over publication of your paper. Sincerely, Viktor V. Zhdankin, Scientific Editor 目前在等卷期号，谢谢老板！谢谢专业的审稿人，负责任的编辑。 2015年04月08日收到校稿通知： From："ARKIVOC Proofs" >To：***@***.edu.cn >Subject：Arkivoc proof 15-9060LR >Date：2015-04-08 02:45:58 *ARKIVOC* Issue vi, 2015 Manuscript number 15-9060LR Dear Authors, The proof of your paper, manuscript number 15-9060LR entitled “********************” is now available for your review and approval. To view and print your article you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be freely downloaded from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html. Please examine your galley proof, list corrections and any other comments and send this back to us by e-mail. Do not edit the PDF file. If you have corrected schemes, figures, or structures, please send it to us as an attachment. Please respond within 7 working days (even if you have no corrections), indicating the issue name and article number on all correspondences. Publication will proceed as soon as your corrections are received. *Printed Copy* If you would like to order printed copies of your work, please contact http://www.amazon.com Thank you for publishing to ARKIVOC Sincerely, The Arkivoc Team 2015年04月09日： Dear authors: We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has now been posted on the ARKIVOC web site at www.arkat-usa.org in volume ***, Part ** page number *** at http://www.arkat-usa.org/*******) To view and print your article you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be freely downloaded from http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep.html. Thank you for publishing to ARKIVOC Yours sincerely, Arkivoc team 期待 ARKIVOC 的IF值上升

HUANGWW822 　2013-05-21 22:34:00.0

主编很好 虽然拒稿了 但是把我的毛病指出来了 感觉很好 对我们是一种尊重

HUANGWW822 　不详 　2013-05-21 22:34:00.0

投稿经验：主编很好 虽然拒稿了 但是把我的毛病指出来了 感觉很好 对我们是一种尊重 其他用户回复：

haigang1109 　2013-04-16 13:11:00.0

这个期刊的编辑很负责任，审稿人也都很认真，大多是这个领域的名副其实的专家，审稿意见很多，基本上把论文中存在的问题都能一一指出，审稿意见中主要侧重于创新性以及是否对读者具有阅读价值。

haigang1109 　不详 　2013-04-16 13:11:00.0

投稿经验：这个期刊的编辑很负责任，审稿人也都很认真，大多是这个领域的名副其实的专家，审稿意见很多，基本上把论文中存在的问题都能一一指出，审稿意见中主要侧重于创新性以及是否对读者具有阅读价值。 其他用户回复：

buchwald 　2012-06-04 19:22:00.0

审稿速度很快，发表速度也快，从投稿到正式出版(有页码)大概5-6个月吧。 审稿人也非常仔细，要求的数据比较全。可惜影响因子低了点。算是4区里面较好的杂志吧。

buchwald 　不详 　2012-06-04 19:22:00.0

投稿经验：审稿速度很快，发表速度也快，从投稿到正式出版(*页*)大概5-6个月吧。
审稿人也非常仔细，要求的数据比较全。可惜影响因子低了点。算是4区里面较好的杂志吧。 其他用户回复：