lareina1
2018-04-06 11:39:00.0
IOP的如果有一个被拒了， 这篇论文就不能再投他旗下的其他杂志。。。别问我怎么知道的。。。
lareina1
2018-03-09 16:02:00.0
虽然悲剧了，但是把时间说一下，供参考吧。。 18年2月11号投的，很快就awaiting referee reports，到2018年3月8号，查询状态就是awaiting decision，晚上十一点多发现reject了。。。纯模拟没有试验，感觉很受伤害。 下面是给的意见，欢迎大家一起探讨。。 REFEREE REPORT(S): COMMENTS FROM EDITORIAL BOARD: Associate Editor Comments to the Author: This work is, at the very best, at the borders of the scope of MSMSE, which reads "new research work that advances the understanding and prediction of material behaviour at scales from atomistic to macroscopic through modelling and simulation." The main reason for rejecting this manuscript is that the model contains no aspect of structure at all; instead, it uses a rule-of-mixture approach together with a very old pressure-dependent yield function. The modeling referred to dates back to the 1970, and does not recognize developments in the since the 80's by Riedel and others. Additional critical issues: a) The authors emphasize a difference in the efficiency of single versus double action compaction, that is motivated by Fig. 4. They do no, however, give any explanation for this difference. In fact, the observations is surprising since double action compaction can be regarded as single action compaction relative to the symmetry plane. The only difference then is the length over which the die wall friction works. If this line of reasoning is correct, there should be an inherent length effect in compation, and I would be surprised if this is not known in the field. b) The data are fit to empirical expressions with at least five decimals. In view of the crudeness of the material model, the number of significant digits must be much smaller. Minor comments: - It is not _in_ the FEA analysis that Young's modulus and yield strength are calculated by a Voigt mixture, but _for the purpose of_. - the definition of the relative density (in eq. (6)) comes much later than its first mention (above (3)). - the origin of the expressions (11) and (12) is unclear.
amber2076
2017-01-24 09:25:00.0
这个是open access吗？
寒小潭
2015-07-25 01:34:00.0
一个月了，等待审稿人意见。 现在两个月了，还是原状态。
564147973
2015-05-28 15:16:00.0
Date Submitted: 09-Apr-2015 Date Decisioned: 21-May-2015 只有一个审稿人，给的意见非常正面，The paper can be accepted in its present form. JCR的报告出来了，2014年IF=2.167
gaoyangbuaa
2015-02-04 20:03:00.0
我是1.30投稿的，到今天还是Manuscript Received，这是什么情况，编辑有没有看到呢，有没有with editor的状态呢？请各位有经验的大神指导一下！
qchen_xjtu
2014-11-03 16:16:00.0
估计我又要挂了，才四天就是Awaiting decision
duraconc
2013-09-11 10:53:00.0
在线投稿网址已更新： http://authors.iop.org/atom/usermgmt.nsf/AuthorServices?OpenForm&ISSN=0965-0393
数据整理自公开网络的投稿反馈，仅供参考。
